Hypertension → ↑ pressure → ↑ wall stress
Concentric hypertrophy → ↑ wall thickness → ↓ wall stress


We can also test this law using different radii
With different widths
Or with different pressures
And let us first make the fibers circumferential
We orient a cube to so that fibers are aligned with one of the axes.

Taken from 10.1186/s12968-016-0258-x under [CC BY 4.0 DD](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_stress_tensor#/media/File:Components_stress_tensor_cartesian.svg under [CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en)
In the calculations so far we have assumed that the heart is linear elastic, isotropic and undergoes small deformation (e.g steel). However, the myocardium is nonlinear, anisotropic and undergoes large deformations.

We can redo the analysis using ellipsoids with different widths and ratios between the short and long axis
We fix the radius along the short axis and vary the width and the long axis radius

Laplace law is good for intuition about how pressure, wall thickness and radius is related to the wall stress
But, it does not capture
Models based on finite element method can be fitted to clinical data which allows for patient-specific stress estimations
Slides and material
--- <style scoped>section { justify-content: start; }</style> ## Laplace law does not take into account that the heart is contracting  